beginnings

Lori, thanks for getting us started!

I liked that you began by giving us a sense of where you are with this 'issue', especially since much of the book is a personal faith journey. I have to admit that so far (i.e. in the introduction and first chapter) I haven't entirely been able to relate to his particular issues with evangelicalism. I think this is simply because I have had little acquaintance with either the social dimensions of fundamentalism or the kind of reformed systematic theology he dislikes so much. My primary experience of evangelicalism has been at Westmont and (as I often insist to my Anglican chaplain) I think that Westmont does a fairly good job combining the intellectual and experiential sides of faith. I certainly have not been drawn to Anglicanism because I find evangelicalism overly rationale. In fact one of the reasons I like going to an Anglican church is because it doesn't 'make me want to shoot myself in the foot' as a historian or an academic. I suppose this is because my impression of Episcopal churches are that they tend to be more liberal, progressive, historically minded and 'intellectual'... but I think that Westmont succeeded on these points as well. I just don't think that the average evangelical church does.

I suppose I should confess that I am coming at this discussion having already decided (albeit not irrevocably) to belong to an Episcopal Church. And frankly, a large part of this decision has simply come from the fact that I am uncomfortable in contemporary worship settings. I like the ritual and repetition of liturgy; I love that reverence and not spontaneous emotionalism is the order of the day. But I recognize that this sort of setting does and has in the past, seems stifling to many... it's precisely the reason why the evangelical movement started in the first place. But I disagree with Webber's point that there is a greater willingness to accept mystery in the Anglican church and that sacraments are somehow an escape from over-rationalism. The body of theology surrounding sacraments (as far as I understand) is long and complicated; and it was actually in reaction to the overly rationale 'intellectual gymastics' of scholastic theologians (of which Anglicanism is the inheritor) that the Reformation called for a simple return to the Bible. Perhaps the medieval asthetic of the Episcopal church feels deep and mysterious simply because it is so different from evangelical services, but I think that we could easily argue that the spontaneity and emotion of evangelicalism would provide a sense of mystery for a convert in the other direction.

So really what I've related here is that I have not nearly so good reasons as Webber for going to an Episcopal church. Largely I do just because I like it better. And I'm hoping that this discussion will help me to formulate better reasons for my choice than simply my discomfort with the alternative!!